Strata Legal Expenses

Dispute between board and owner: The company was involved in a dispute over flooring laid in a unit by an owner in violation of the articles. The company gave the owner an order to remedy the situation. The owner challenged the articles in court. The lawsuit defence was represented and the company`s legal fees amounted to more than $12,000. Under the WDE coverage, as is clear from the term itself, insurers pay only the costs of legal defense incurred and reasonable investigative or expert fees incurred with the written consent of the insurer. However, insurers do not pay compensation ordered by a court or negotiated between the parties. The Court held that legal costs that may be claimed under a lien are subject to an assessment procedure in which the reasonableness of the legal costs claimed can be assessed. There is no such mechanism for court costs claimed without privilege. Section 112 of the Condominium Act clearly states that owners have two weeks to respond to a request for payment before a claim can be made to the civil settlement court or a lien can be filed. In other words, the law provides for a period of two weeks during which payment can be made before proceedings can be initiated during which the legal costs of a claim could be claimed.

First, the strata have successfully argued that they are entitled to court fees under a non-standard bylaw that states that a homeowner must compensate diapers out of their legal fees. For more information on this argument, see our previous article. So far, this approach seems to be the surest way to claim legal fees in the RTA. Condominium corporations considering compensation legislation should seek legal advice and ensure that bylaws are passed and registered before filing a lawsuit with the CRT. In this case, three owners in a bargaining class had all received letters demanding payment of late shift fees. The teams had sought legal advice and, in their initial requests, demanded arrears of shift fees plus legal fees. Legal fees were not disclosed. The reason for this is that section 86(2A) of the Co-ownership Management Act 2015 (NSW) states that the owners` company can only recover an unpaid contribution at the end of one month after the due date and due date, «together with any interest incurred on that unpaid contribution and the reasonable costs (i.e.

costs) of the owning company to recover those amounts». Co-ownership companies wishing to claim the legal costs related to the execution of their articles of association in the CRT must either amend their articles of association before the procedure or claim the legal costs in accordance with Article 133. If shifts do not have compensation legislation, they can recover legal fees under section 133 if the Court clarifies this issue in the future. Owners and condominium corporations should obtain appropriate legal advice on the options available to them when claims or collection proposals are presented to them in order to reimburse the condominium corporation for amounts that appear to be based on a resolution of the condominium corporation. The first step may be to choose Dentons and contact your condo manager. We provide accurate and objective advice without adhering to personal interest or historical connections. The Client shall bear its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation, preparation, signature and performance of the Agreement (and all documents referred to therein). Once the insurers have indemnified the owner company under PL Cover, the insurers take control of the case and correspond directly with the third-party claimant. Insurers will determine whether the owners` company can be held legally liable for damages claimed. When a case is complex, insurers can appoint fact-based investigators, liability investigators or even lawyers with whom the owning firm must work and provide all relevant information upon request. WHAT WE DO: Lesperance Mendes has been advising Strata Corporation and Strata Owners on governance and condominium litigation since 1997.

For more information on how we can help you with your shift question, contact Paul G Mendes at 604-685-4894 or email pgm@lmlaw.ca or Alex J. Chang at ajc@lmlaw.ca 604-685-1255. Property – Harassment/Trespassing: A neighbour disrupts the operation of the business by constantly parking his vehicle on the property to the detriment of the owners whose parking spaces are used. Despite reasonable efforts to resolve this issue, it becomes necessary to take legal action.